民乐交响,展现时代气象******
在推进中国式现代化的新征程中,民族管弦乐艺术将继续为时代放歌、为人民抒怀,贯通历史古今、彰显文化自信,奏响新时代的强音。
黄河,被誉为中华民族的母亲河,孕育了中华文明,涵养了风土人情,承载了丰富多彩的文化样态与精神气质。民族管弦乐艺术是当代中国音乐家的创造,融汇了根脉的传承、包容的胸怀、创新的精神,是中国音乐“洋为中用、古为今用”的重要成果与典型代表。
党的二十大报告提出,坚持以人民为中心的创作导向,推出更多增强人民精神力量的优秀作品。由中国广播民族乐团、中国广播合唱团联袂演出,作曲家白浩钰创作的大型民族交响音乐会《大河九曲》,立足中华优秀传统文化的音乐积淀,运用民族管弦乐赞颂祖国的山河壮丽,展示黄河流域的文化底蕴与风土人情,进而表现中国人的根与魂,展现出恢弘的时代气象。
在民族特色的根基上进行创造性转化、创新性发展,文艺创作才能立得住、传得开、留得下、接地气。《大河九曲》以表现地域文化为出发点,意在彰显黄河流域的自然与人文特质。作品深情描写了青藏高原的肃穆与庄严,若尔盖湿地的梦幻与旖旎,贺兰山下古沙场的空旷与苍茫,胶东半岛的开放与蓬勃……作品用音乐的笔触展现了壮丽山河,挖掘了地域文化所承载的精神内涵,引发听众的无限憧憬。作品最后以男声独唱《大河母亲》呼应主题,将黄河的自然之美与人文之丽再度升华,深情歌颂母亲河的大爱,引发情感共鸣。
《大河九曲》以民族管弦乐为落脚点,意在展现民族音乐的内涵与魅力。作品参考了民歌、舞蹈、曲艺等多种艺术形式,并选取了宁夏花儿、山西蒲剧、河南豫剧等作为创作素材,运用了民族管弦乐队及具有典型特色的马头琴、板胡、唢呐、打击乐器等,以凸显音乐性格的鲜明。作品中,民族乐器的民间性与时代性得到了恰当的运用与融合。无论是高音板胡的高亢明亮、中音板胡的深情独白,还是马头琴、大提琴深情而自然的流淌;无论是管子与埙的幽咽、深邃,还是唢呐“咔腔”的拟人化表现,抑或是弹拨乐组的点性线条对大河奔腾流淌的形象塑造——民族管弦乐队“吹拉弹打”各声部间的对话与融合在《大河九曲》中都得到了充分展示,体现了民族管弦乐塑造音乐形象的独特能力。
从家喻户晓的《花好月圆》《丰收锣鼓》到格调高雅的《月儿高》《春江花月夜》,民族管弦乐艺术在传承文化根脉、丰富人们情感世界上发挥了重要作用。中华优秀传统文化涵养着中国人的传统美德与时代精神,是塑造可信、可爱、可敬的中国形象取之不尽、用之不竭的力量源泉,也为民族管弦乐的创作提供了丰厚土壤。在推进中国式现代化的新征程中,民族管弦乐艺术将继续为时代放歌、为人民抒怀,贯通历史古今、彰显文化自信,奏响新时代的强音。
(作者宋阳为中国民族管弦乐学会副秘书长)
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() ![]() 吉好彩票地图 |